Multi-Institutional Study of Leadership
Connecting Research to Transformative Practice
FAN2011402.JPG

Theoretical Framework

More than the Social Change Model

The original theoretical framework for the MSL was the Social Change Model of Leadership Development (SCM; HERI, 1996). The SCM measures socially responsible leadership capacity defined as “a purposeful, collaborative, values-based process that results in positive social change” (Komives, Wagner, & Associates, 2009, p. xii).  

The MSL theoretical framework has evolved to capture the increasing complexity of the study.

The current theoretical framework is still nested in the values of the SCM, but draws from a much wider set of theoretical bases.

This includes:

MSL-theoretical-comparison.jpg
  • Contemporary Leadership Theory– Research from MSL has demonstrated that post-industrial theories of leadership have much in common. Thus, the theoretical framework now draws on key dimensions from a wider range of contemporary theories.

  • Social Psychology & Human Development– Research from MSL points to the complexity of developmental processes. Contributing to leadership development involves much more than simple skill-building. As such, the theoretical frame relies heavily on insights from psychological and human development theories to inform the study.

  • Critical & JusticeBased Perspectives– The MSL design has always attempted to model the values of social justice on which the SCM is predicated. This has led to increasing attention to design elements that draw on critical and justice-based perspectives.

Model Constructs Does MSL Measure? Direct or Indirect How?
Authentic
Leadership
Self-Awareness Directly ✔ Consciousness of Self
✔ Collective Racial Esteem
✔ Motivation
✔ Self-Directed Learning
✔ Resiliency
Internalized Moral Perspective Directly ✔ Congruence
✔ Commitment
✔ Resiliency
✔ Cognitive Skills
Balanced Processing Directly ✔ Cognitive Skills
✔ Social Perspective Taking
Relational Transparency Indirectly ✔ Consciousness of Self
✔ Leadership Efficacy
✔ Resiliency
✔ Congruence
Relational
Leadership
Model
Purpose Directly ✔ Commitment
✔ Common Purpose
Process Directly ✔ Common Purpose
✔ Collaboration
✔ Controversy with Civility
Inclusive Indirectly ✔ Collaboration
✔ Social Perspective Taking
Ethical Indirectly ✔ Consciousness of Self
✔ Congruence
✔ Citizenship
Empowering Indirectly ✔ Collaboration
Emotionally
Intelligent
Leadership**
Consciousness of Context indirectly ✔ Belonging / Climate
✔ Cognitive Skills
✔ Social Perspective Taking
✔ Directed Learning
Consciousness of Self Directly ✔ Consciousness of Self
✔ Collective Racial Esteem
✔ Motivation
✔ Resiliency
✔ Congruence
Consciousness of Others Directly ✔ Common Purpose
✔ Collaboration
✔ Social Perspective Taking
✔ Controversy with Civility
Servant
Leadership
Conceptualizing Indirectly ✔ Common Purpose
✔ Cognitive Skills
Emotional Healing Indirectly ✔ Social Perspective Taking
Putting Followers First
Helping Followers Grow & Succeed
Behaving Ethically Indirectly ✔ Consciousness of Self
✔ Congruence
✔ Citizenship
Empowering Indirectly ✔ Collaboration
Creating Value for the Community Directly ✔ Citizenship
Leadership
Practices
Inventory**
Challenge the Process Indirectly ✔ Change
✔ Cognitive Skills
✔ Leadership Efficacy
✔ Controversy with Civility
Create a Shared Vision Directly ✔ Common Purpose
✔ Collaboration
Enable Other to Act Indirectly ✔ Collaboration
Model the Way Indirectly ✔ Congruence
✔ Commitment
✔ Resiliency
Encourage the Heart Indirectly ✔ Collaboration
Transformational
Leadership
Idealized Influence / Charisma Indirectly ✔ Congruence
✔ Commitment
Inspirational Motivation Indirectly ✔ Common Purpose
✔ Collaboration
Intellectual Stimulation Indirectly ✔ Controversy with Civility
✔ Common Purpose
✔ Cognitive Skills
Individualized Consideration Indirectly ✔ Social Perspective Taking
✔ Collaboration

** Leadership Practices Inventory and Emotionally Intelligent Leadership are copyrighted by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.